บทคัดย่อ ภาษาอังกฤษ |
The objectives of this research were to compare problem-solving thinking ability, science achievement, and metacognition between students receiving STEM+EF approach (experimental group) and students receiving traditional teaching method (control group). The samples were 2 classrooms from 5 schools in Muang 2. The experimental group consisted of 18 students while the control group consisted of 20 students. The research instruments were 1) science achievement test 2) the problem-solving ability test and 3) the metacognitive awareness inventory. The data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results indicated that the experimental group had statistically higher mean score on problem-solving thinking ability, science achievement and metacognition, than the control group. We concluded that the STEM+EF learning approach could enhance problem-solving thinking ability, science achievement and metacognition of these students. The objectives of this research were to compare problem-solving thinking ability, science achievement, and metacognition between students receiving STEM+EF approach (experimental group) and students receiving traditional teaching method (control group). The samples were 2 classrooms from 5 schools in Muang 2. The experimental group consisted of 18 students while the control group consisted of 20 students. The research instruments were 1) science achievement test 2) the problem-solving ability test and 3) the metacognitive awareness inventory. The data were analyzed by mean, standard deviation and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). The results indicated that the experimental group had statistically higher mean score on problem-solving thinking ability, science achievement and metacognition, than the control group. We concluded that the STEM+EF learning approach could enhance problem-solving thinking ability, science achievement and metacognition of these students.
|